In recent years, I have begun to pay much more attention to the period after the photoshoot and, to a lesser extent, the period before it. All of us photographers believed that the most important thing is what we photograph and how we photograph it at the moment of shooting. I'm starting to believe that if we leave this more free, more random, more relaxed, it will give us better results, which we will utilize by studying our photos after the shoot. The duration of this process is extremely important. The choices of photos we make are what give significant weight to our work, and based on these choices, we do our editing. Editing is never done to make a photo good from where it isn't, but if we understand why and if it is good, then the editing will enhance it. However, the main thing that the post-photoshoot period does is to study our photos so that it can reveal to us the content that we shouldn't know beforehand and cannot know beforehand. Thus, we become spectators of our own photos, becoming curators and commentators of our own photographic work so that we can think about what distinguishes us from anyone else and how, based on this, we will organize the next step of our photos which is the thought preceding the photoshoot. So if we divide our work into three parts: before the photoshoot, after the photoshoot, and during the photoshoot, we will see that the after might play the first, dominant role. This also leads to the creation of a personal portfolio, a cohesive body of work that has a coherent thread connecting all the photos with what we are, which we discover by gradually putting one photo next to another. It is very simple and not unfair to create portfolios based on the depicted subjects, but the most important and interesting thing that will give weight to our work is a personal portfolio whose photos have us as their subject. And this requires a lot of work, a lot of time, a lot of thought, and mainly continuous questioning.